Online advertising has a way to go

On 27 September, 2012 by Matt


Advertising in Minority Report: not there yet

I probably shouldn’t write this because everyone knows online advertising is an all-invasive beast growing rapidly into every corner of the web and it’s only going to get bigger and more annoying. Hell, I’ve even put an advert on the side of this page (woohoo, here comes 60p a month) and in fact it’s these kind of Google ads that I really don’t get. If we’re going to have to have them pervading our web experiences (and we are) they might as well be better.

Right now they broadly split into two camps: the irrelevant and the pointless.

The irrelevant

Usually: I’ve just arrived at a big news site, so of course here’s a massive advert of the latest mid-range sports saloon. I certainly can’t afford one so that’s easy to ignore. Or: I’m on a film magazine site so here’s the biggest new blockbuster filling the background. I might go and see that at some point. These ads are targeted around the demographics of the website’s audience. It’s the age-old model of the newspaper/magazine industry and it’s probably about as effective as a print advert.

There’s obviously the bonus of a link to the official website of the product but I’m not going to visit that, I’m going to judge whether to buy/consume something based on independent reviews and peer feedback. Maybe some people are still clicking through but they’re going to be fewer and further between as this digital generation ages. So these ads are pretty much irrelevant relics.

The pointless

These are the ads that I really want to challenge. These are the future and they’re certainly going to get better but right now they defeat themselves. How they work is this: you visit a website and then later on when browsing other ad-supported sites, you get shown an advert for that website. That’s pretty much it. There is the subtlety that if you’re lucky sometimes you’ll be shown a set of search results for products you’ve looked at. All done of the cookies created by your web-browsing behaviour.

If you’re just being shown an advert for the website you’ve been to that’s most likely a complete waste because you certainly know that website exists, as you’ve just been there. I quite regularly get adverts for my energy company, which makes literally no sense to me. Not only do I know the company already exists but surely I’m the last person they want to see that advert, that advertising dollar is better spent on everyone but me. If they’re tracking your website visit via a cookie, going forward it might be an idea to provide a different cookie if you reach a login url.

If you’re being shown search results from the site you just visited that’s just as pointless. Several times I’ve been served up adverts featuring products I just bought. Hey you’re right I am interested in that! But you’re too late. Or perhaps I didn’t buy, in which case I probably don’t want to be reminded of those products I obviously didn’t want. Either way it’s like being showed a trailer for a film you’ve just watched. There is the use case that I didn’t buy but might yet do in the future but is the answer repeatedly show me those things across every website I visit like a harassing salesman? Well, it might work for some.

The future

The thought of browsing the web with cookies tracking you scares some people. But for me it’s a long way to being scary. When you can actually predict what I want to see and click on, that’s scary. It’s also, paradoxically, the only way online ads are going to be truly useful and get impressive click-through rates.

2 Responses to “Online advertising has a way to go”

  • Vox Usi

    So if I understand, you’re not against banner ads -after all, you have one nice one right here- but you’re annoyed that they can’t read your mind? …

    Now, you’re right, in terms of targeting at this time, if only privacy advocates knew what the industry is capable of, they’d certainly relax. However, things are changing fast, with players sharing more and more, so YOUR information is being passed along a long, long chain.

    What annoys me personally is that millions of dollars are made ON MY BACK; and for what return for ME? “Relevant” advertising? I’d rather be paid directly to watch the bl**dy ads and then elaborate on important questions like, if I had the budget, would I buy a Lexus? (I sure would, as I would a Mercedes or a Ferrari!)
    (at least I gave you some clicks, that’s why your revenue might double next month!)

  • Matt

    You’re right, I’m not against advertising, I think we need it to work so we can continue to have free to access websites and if it’s going to work it will need to be better. Good point about knowing who’s doing what with your information though – that is fast becoming the next big online battle.

    Interesting idea about being paid directly to watch the ads, though this may slightly screw the poor advert-hosting site! Could we have people going direct to big-brand sites to earn micro-payments?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • Tweets

    • Competing with Clerkenwell Design Week we're off and running on v2 of ,
    • Been an incredible day at Lords. Looking at a great result but slightly annoyed there won't be enough cricket for the food we've brought.,
    • Worth noting, this year's scoreboard is a lovely bit of design. Well done Sweden. ,
  • What?

    This is the blog of former UX designer now product manager Matt Isherwood.

    Here I attempt to write insightfully on UX/interaction/product design but in truth it could be about whatever I happen to be interested in at the time.

    It's all good practice though, eh?